شناخت پژوهی مطالعات سیاسی

شناخت پژوهی مطالعات سیاسی

جنگ هیبریدی و شناختی ایالات‌متحده آمریکا علیه جمهوری اسلامی ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 دانش آموخته ارشد مطالعات منطقه ای، دانشگاه یزد، یزد، ایران
2 دانشجوی دکتری روابط بین‌الملل، دانشگاه آزاد، واحد تهران شمال، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
اگر امروزه (2024) دسته‌بندی جدیدی از جنگ‌ها ارائه شود، بدون شک جنگ هیبریدی و شناختی یکی از مدرن‌ترین آن‌ها است، چرا که این جنگ‌ها یکی از پرطرفدارترین و رایج‌ترین جنگ‌های پیش‌رو کنشگران است. هر چند در شکل‌گیری این نوع جنگ‌ها هنوز ابهاماتی وجود دارد. ولی آنچه باعث جلب توجه به این جنگ‌ها شده است، شیوع ویروس کرونا و جنگ روسیه و اوکراین می‌باشد. از این‌رو لازم است در جامعه علمی ایران چنین جنگ‌های مورد بررسی و تحلیل قرار گیرند تا قبل از بحران و درگیر شدن با چالش‌های عمقی آن‌ها نقاط قوت و ضعف شناسایی شود. لذا نویسندگان در این مقاله تلاش خواهند کرد به این پرسش «جنگ هیبریدی و شناختی ایالات‌متحده آمریکا علیه ایران چگونه قابل ارزیابی است؟» پاسخ دهند. رویکرد تحقیق نوشتار حاضر توصیفی- تبیینی و داده‌ها با استفاده از روش کتابخانه‌ای گردآوری شده‌اند. یافته‌های کلی نشان می‌دهد در حال حاضر آمریکا جنگ هیبریدی و شناختی علیه ج.ا.ایران در قالب جنگ روانی، اطلاعاتی، سایبری، تبلیغاتی، رسانه‌ای و اعتراضات داخلی دنبال می‌کند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Hybrid and Cognitive Warfare of the United States Against the Islamic Republic of Iran

نویسندگان English

Arash Saeedi rad 1
Majid farokhi cheshmrh soltani 2
1 Master of Regional Studies
2 PhD student of international relations, Azad University,, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

If a new classification of wars were presented today (2024), hybrid and cognitive warfare would undoubtedly be among the most modern, as they are some of the most popular and common forms of warfare among contemporary actors. Although some ambiguities remain in the formation of these types of wars, what has drawn significant attention to them is the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia-Ukraine war. Therefore, it is necessary for the Iranian academic community to examine and analyze these wars so that their strengths and weaknesses can be identified before a crisis occurs or deeper challenges arise. Thus, in this article, the authors aim to address the question: "How can the hybrid and cognitive warfare of the United States against Iran be evaluated?" The research approach in this article is descriptive-explanatory, and the data has been collected through library-based methods. The overall findings indicate that, currently, the U.S. is engaging in hybrid and cognitive warfare against the Islamic Republic of Iran, which includes psychological warfare, intelligence operations, cyber attacks, propaganda, media manipulation, and inciting domestic protests.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Hybrid warfare
cognitive warfare
United States
Islamic Republic of Iran

Andrew, K. (2020). Hybrid Wars: The Indirect Adaptive Approach To Regime Change. Moscow, Russia: peoples ' Friendship University of Russia.
Bayat, B. (2023). analysis of riots of 1401, Tehran, National Defense University. [In Persian]
Ebrahimikiapei, H. (2020). Hybrid Warfare: The US Approach to the Islamic Republic of Iran. International Relations Researches, 10(2), 155-180.[In Persian]
Gates, R. (2014). Memoirs of secretary at war.
Gardner, H. (2015). Hybrid Warfare: Iranian and Russian Versions of “Little Green Men” and Contemporary Conflict. NATO Defense College, Rome.
Gardner, H. (2021). Hybrid Warfare: Iranian and Russian Versions of "Little Green Men" and Contemporary Conflict. Rome: NATO Defense College.
Ghasemi, F., Esmaeili Farzin, I. (2017). Hybrid Warfare in Complex-Chaotic International System. MILITARY MANAGEMENT QUARTERLY, 17(66), 52-92. [In Persian]
Hajizadeh, S. (2022). Contextual, theoretical, conceptual and practical explanation of cognitive warfare A case study of Russia. Iranian Journal of Wargaming, 5(10), 103-143. [In Persian]
Heads of State and Government. (2016). Warsaw Summit Communiqué. [Online]. Available: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/na....
Huovinen, P. (2011). Hybrid warfare–Just a twist of compound warfare. Views on warfare from the United States Armed Forces perspective. Helsinki: National Defense University.
Jolani, Q., Foulidi, Q. (2018). Combined wars; A review of literature. Tehran, National Defense University. [In Persian]
Kalantari, F. (2016). The Characteristics of a Possible Future War against I.R. of Iran and Strategies to Deal with It. Defence Studies, 14(4), 103-131. [In Persian]
kalantari, F., Hosseini, S. H. (2024). Factors and methods of combined network warfare of the United States against the Islamic Republic of Iran. American Strategic Studies, (), -[In Persian]
Kaldor, M. (2005). Elaborating the ‘New War’ Thesis. in Re-thinking the Nature of War, I. Duyvesteyn,J. Angstrom,Eds. New York: Frank Cass, 210–224.
Khamenei, S.A. (2016). Statements in the meeting of the Chairman and members of the Council of Leadership Experts. https://farsi.khamenei.ir/speech-content?id=32587. [In Persian]
Karimi, Y. (1993). Psychological War of the West against Iran. Defense Policy Quarterly, No. (72), 81-87. [In Persian]
Lind, W. S. (2004). Understanding fourth generation war. Military Review, 84(5), 12-16.
Maloney, S. (2015). Un-sanctioning Iran: What the nuclear deal means for the future of sanctions, In: Center Middle East Politics and Policy, Available from: http://www.brookings.edu/blogs/markaz/posts/2015/8/3-iran-sanctionsfuturenuclear-dealMaloney.
Matuszczyk, A. (2012). Creative Stratagems: Creative and Systems Thinking in Handling Social Conflict. Kibworth:Modern Society Publishing.
Mahpishanian, M. (2010). U.S. Media Weapons in the Soft War with the Islamic Republic of Iran. Psychological Operations Quarterly, ( 27), 162 – 183. [In Persian]
Marsili, M. (2021). From Battlefield to Political Arena. Shifting the Clausewitzian Paradigm. Political Reflection,vol. 7, (27), 19–25.
Marsili, M.M. (2023). Hybrid Warfare: Above or Below the Threshold of Armed Conflict?. HSZ-HDR,  150(1–2), 36–48.
Moradi, H.E. (2011). Editor's Speech: Media War and Control of Public Opinion. Psychological Operations Studies Quarterly, No(32), 1-4. [In Persian]
Michael, F.T. (2021). The Field of Fight How We Can Win the Global War against Radical Islam and Its Allies. New York St. Martins Press.
NATO. (2023). NATO’s response to hybrid threats. [Online]. Available: https://www.nato.int/cps/en/na....
Rashidzadeh, F. (2006). Information Age and Combined War. Military Management Quarterly, No(21), 41-70. [In Persian]
Neighborhood, H. (2021). Mölder, V. Sazonov,A. Chochia, T. Kerikmäe, Eds. Cham: Springer, 149–172.
Saeedirad, A., Tavana, M.A. (2016). Iran and ISIS extremism. Tehran; Arena Publications. [In Persian]
Sun Tzŭ. (1910). The Art of War. London: Luzac & Co.
U.S. Department of the Air Force. (1976). Air Force Pamphlet 110-31, International Law – The Conduct of ArmedConflict and Air Operations. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Air Force.
U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2010). Hybrid Warfare, GAO-10-1036R. [Online].Available: https://www.gao.gov/products/g....
U.S. Marine Corps. (2022). Information, MCDP 8. Washington, DC: Department of the Navy.
Zulfiqari, V. (2012). Political Behavior of Modern Chinese Diplomacy. Political Studies Quarterly, 6( 21), 193-214. [In Persian]
دوره 1، شماره 1 - شماره پیاپی 1
فصل تابستان
تابستان 1403
صفحه 126-146

  • تاریخ دریافت 23 مرداد 1403
  • تاریخ بازنگری 06 شهریور 1403
  • تاریخ پذیرش 16 شهریور 1403